auto configuration systems

[Ralf Mardorf]

> You first said that Arch required less customization, now you say the people do more.

You are wrong, the context is that to customize Arch Linux, you don't
have to worry about that much issues, you don't have to do that much
work, as when you wish to customize Ubuntu. This is by the nature of
those distros. Ubuntu and its policy are aimed to provide OOTB
user-friendly desktop environments, based on a release model. Arch Linux
is what the user makes out of it, it's aimed for customisation. I gave
an example in regards to the different auto-start policies of Arch and
Ubuntu and why each approach has it's advantage and disadvantage,
depending to the approach.

However, since you are even unable to understand what I explained, I
suspect you better stay with Ubuntu, since migrating to another distro
requires at least minimal agility.

Regards,
Ralf