Help, my disk array has one dead member

Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com
Sun Apr 2 03:56:24 UTC 2017


On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Rashkae <ubuntu at tigershaunt.com> wrote:

> On 17-04-01 09:42 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>
>
>> However, my problem is that it takes a similar amount of time to back up
>> a filesystem that large (when full).  I want a filesystem that has some
>> recoverability without weekly 3-day backups.
>>
>>
> That's what daily rsync is for.   (Depending if safely of the data in
> question is worth a second system with similar storage.)
>
> Offsite would be better, but sometimes the amount of data changed/added
> daily and the internet connection available just doesn't make that possible.


That's not going to work for me.  Most of the data is in a single SQLite
database.  It's all or nothing and rsync doesn't help.  Moreover, remember
this is a hobby project, and I have no "offsite" to use.  I can and do back
up the individual contributions to the database, or the algorithms and
commands used, so restoring from those would be  possible but ugly.

Thus, RAID 5.  Not perfect, but what is?

Meanwhile, I'm having my share of troubles building RAID 5, but that's for
another thread.

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman
#define QUESTION ((bb) || (!bb))   /* Shakespeare */

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20170401/7c5c811e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20170401/7c5c811e/attachment.gif>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list