16.04: Graphical login/desktop vanished? (coming closer)
paul at mad-scientist.net
Mon Jul 25 20:15:07 UTC 2016
On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 21:57 +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> The question is: why is there this dependancy of the desktop from NM
> in the first place? Is there any reason why a desktop can't exist
> without such a russian roulette software like NM?
I can't say. It could be many layers deep. Many desktops rely on
network-manager because it manages the network, and the desktop network
configuration facilities offload their responsibilities to it (for
example via network-manager-gnome or whatever).
You'll have to trace down the dependency list (maybe aptitudes --show-
deps will help) and discuss the situation with the maintainers of the
Alternatively you could try to create a "dummy network-manager" package
which provided network-manager but didn't install anything, then pin
it. Or something like that.
> I KNOW how my network is structured. NM is trying to GUESS how it is
> structured. I don't want any software to GUESS. I prefer to TELL
I'm not sure what you mean by "guess". In every environment I've been
in for the last 5 years at least everyone just uses DHCP to tell hosts
about network structure, and NM handles that just fine. Also NM does a
lot more: it handles proxying, it handles VPNs very well, it deals with
roaming and wireless for mobile systems, etc. It does have some
annoying things (see a thread I posted a few weeks ago complaining
about it constantly roaming every 2 minutes... and the workaround I
NM is one of those things that had a very rocky start, and so people
have bad impressions of it from using it when it was younger. However,
I use it as-is on all my desktops and laptops and (with the exception
of the above issue with a poorly-written proprietary wireless driver
from Broadcom) it works just fine and doesn't bother me anymore. And
I've been configuring networking on Linux since forever... even dialup!
YMMV of course.
More information about the ubuntu-users