passwordless ssh from laptop
Joel Rees
joel.rees at gmail.com
Fri Dec 30 01:10:32 UTC 2016
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Joel Rees <joel.rees at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Chris Green <cl at isbd.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:59:39AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Chris Green <cl at isbd.net> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:35:11AM +0000, Colin Law wrote:
>>> >> On 26 December 2016 at 06:26, Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au> wrote:
> [...]
>>> I think the distinction has become fairly general in practice --
>
> Ergo,
>
>>> Passphrases assumed to be used in indirect authentication like public
>>> key,
>
> vs.
>
>>> and passwords being used when directly authenticating.
>
> Also,
>
>>> And (good) passwords being strings like "m0n<e4UR at Tom"
>
> vs.
>
>>> and (good)
>>> passphrases being more like "I have a monk{y for your atom, Kite."
>>>
>>> Neither of which is any good, for either me or you, now that I have posted this.
>>>
>>> Which one would you find easier to remember?
>
> And memorability is part of the distinction.
>
>> But how does it help? I can just as easily have a long password, like
>> "I have a monk{y for your atom, Kite."
>[...]
And it occurs to me that I could have mentioned that I unpacked my
comments from yesterday in a blog post, yesterday:
http://defining-computers.blogspot.com/2016/12/passwords-passphrases-public-key-and.html
Probably was a waste of three hours trying to tease a little more
meaning out of the subject, but it's there if anyone's interested.
Joel Rees
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list