Display driver question.

Petter Adsen petter at synth.no
Mon Apr 11 13:36:50 UTC 2016

On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:03:59 +0400
Teimuraz Abashidze <tgasoft at gmail.com> wrote:

> I feel it a bit slow, and some desktop effects are not working
> properly.
> I remember ages ago there was porprietary driver from ATI/AMD named
> "fglrx", it was much more efficient than radeon, but had some
> compatibility issues.
> Is it supported now?

Fglrx is being phased out, I believe the new name is amdgpu. Wily still
uses fglrx, though, but a newer version might be available from AMD.

> Will it be better for my video card?

Who knows? The only way to say for sure is to try it. Personally I
prefer radeon (mostly because of the issues you mention), but I have no
need for high 3D performance. Only you can say which driver works best
for your usage on your computer.


"I'm ionized"
"Are you sure?"
"I'm positive."

More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list