Slow NFS writes with sec=krb5

Florian Oppermann florian.oppermann at itp.uni-hannover.de
Wed Oct 7 09:51:20 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sorry for talking to myself…

> 1) On one slow machine that is running precise I booted into an
> old kernel image (3.2 instead of 3.13). The behaviour was the
> expected: The kerberized automount got fast write speeds. Booting
> back to 3.13 made it slow again.

I expanded this test scenario on one of our trusty machines and
installed some old kernel versions: From 3.2 to 3.11.10.15 the NFS
mount was fast, it got slow at version 3.12.0rc1 (last two packages
for saucy). (Note: I refer to the packages from
<http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/>.)

Maybe someone with more knowledge about NFS or kernel development
could have a look at the changelog
(<http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.12-rc1-saucy/CHANGES>
).
I believe some change there has undesired effects in certain environment
s.

Best regards,
Florian

On 05.10.2015 18:14, Florian Oppermann wrote:
> On 05.10.2015 17:25, Brandon Vincent wrote:
>> There was an issue with the system detecting if gssd was
>> running, so my only recommendation to you is to update to the
>> latest kernel and NFS/Kerberos related packages and see if that
>> resolves your issue.
> 
> I just tried the following things:
> 
> 1) On one slow machine that is running precise I booted into an
> old kernel image (3.2 instead of 3.13). The behaviour was the
> expected: The kerberized automount got fast write speeds. Booting
> back to 3.13 made it slow again.
> 
> I think this rules out the possibility that some other packages
> have broken something and should be upgraded.
> 
> 2) On one of our trusty machines I installed the .debs for 4.0.0, 
> 4.1.0, 4.2.3 and 4.3.0 from 
> <http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/>. None of the new 
> kernels enabled the fast kerberized NFS automount.
> 
> I suspected them to solve the issue because my laptop with Debian 
> testing had fine write performance. I have to check the kernel
> version though.
> 
> Maybe we’ll just try to setup one machine with a clean 15.10 when
> it’s released.
> 
> Best regards, Florian
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=X0QL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list