Automatic installation - is there an advantage?
Phil
phil_lor at bigpond.com
Sat Mar 21 01:03:04 UTC 2015
Thank you for reading this.
I installed Linux yesterday using the automatic option which puts the
installation alongside Windows as follows:
phil at phil-desktop:~$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5 1.3T 4.5G 1.2T 1% /
none 4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
udev 3.8G 4.0K 3.8G 1% /dev
tmpfs 767M 1.1M 766M 1% /run
none 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
none 3.8G 92K 3.8G 1% /run/shm
none 100M 24K 100M 1% /run/user
I've used this option several times to install Linux on older laptops,
where Linux is the only OS, without a problem. When a new version comes
along, restoring the home directory is an easy task because the backup
only contains a few files, if any at all.
The following is an example of where I've installed Linux using the
manual option. The /boot directory is 300MB and the swap is 4GB, the
same as the ram size.
phil at Asus:~/Python$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda6 18G 12G 4.6G 72% /
none 4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
udev 1.5G 4.0K 1.5G 1% /dev
tmpfs 304M 1.4M 303M 1% /run
none 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock
none 1.5G 756K 1.5G 1% /run/shm
none 100M 24K 100M 1% /run/user
/dev/sda7 18G 4.8G 12G 30% /usr/local
/dev/sda8 26G 24G 935M 97% /home
/dev/sda5 74G 48G 27G 64% /media/phil/495B-6D38
I've always used this option on my own computers so that I can protect
my home directory and the usr/local directory during installation.
Although I keep fresh backups the size of the backup could make
restoring these directories a somewhat tedious task.
So my question is. Should I revert back to the manual option with
partitions along the lines of those listed above and reinstall again or
is there some advantage to leaving the system as it is? If there is an
advantage what is the recommended location for my /usr/local/ files?
--
Regards,
Phil
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list