Monitor resolution question
Kenneth Marcy
kmmos1 at frontier.com
Mon May 26 05:11:12 UTC 2014
On 5/25/2014 7:22 PM, Phil wrote:
> Thank you for reading this.
>
> I have Real Flight, a model aeroplane simulator, running on a laptop
> with a screen resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels and it's a real struggle
> to fly almost any plane because they are very small and pixelated
> except when viewed close up on the runway. HDMI input to the TV
> results in a larger picture with, of course, larger pixels so there
> isn't much improvement there.
>
> I'm considering a Shuttle XPC computer. Its integrated Intel graphics
> has a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels. I'm also considering an 21.5"
> LG led monitor which has a resolution of 1920 x 1080. I calculate that
> both monitors have a DPI of 96.
>
> So my question is, would I see a remarkable difference in flying ease
> between the two systems? I'm very reluctant to take a punt without
> knowing if the cost is likely to be worthwhile.
About a decade ago I bought a Dell Latitude D800 with a 1920 x 1200
resolution that was called WUXGA. I mention this only to indicate that
this resolution level is technologically mature.
In that same time frame there was also a quad resolution at four times
that pixel density -- 3840 x 2400. WQUXGA screens manufactured at this
resolution were very expensive, and are now out of production.
In recent years the 1920 x 1200 resolution standard (16:10) has been
replaced with a 1920 x 1080 resolution standard (16:9) for computer
monitors. More recently there has been a revival of interest in the
quad density idea -- this time in the television manufacturing
industry. They are referring to this as 4K television, and are
implementing it with large flat-screen monitors capable of 3840 x 2160
pixel screen resolution. While it is true that some of these screens
will be driven by specialized boxes connected to television delivery
services, some others of them will be connected to computers receiving
their programming content via the Internet.
My suggestion concerning your potential replacement system for flight
simulation is that whatever you choose should be compatible with, or at
least upgradable to, these newly available 4K quad density performance
standards, and the software that you use to operate on this hardware
should be fully capable of utilizing the hardware's capacities.
Software will need to be capable at both operating system and
application levels in order to best succeed with these newer graphics
standards. These suggestions may not be completely implementable at
this moment, but over the next few months they may be brought to
fruition and user enjoyment. In the meantime you have a new set of
subjects about which to research and to inform yourself to determine
your preferred choices.
Ken
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list