firefox, trackers and ghostery
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Mon Jul 15 06:32:47 UTC 2013
On 15/07/13 08:38, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 14 July 2013 18:36:34 pete smout did opine:
>> On 14/07/13 19:00, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>>> I've posted in the past about how slow Firefox can be when it's
>>> loading pages. Now I've found something that makes a noticeable
>>> difference: the addon "ghostery" that blocks "trackers," which their
>>> website defines as page elements - scripts, pixels, iframes, etc. -
>>> that are normally invisible to the user. What "trackers" seem to be
>>> all about is marketing, and apparently they've been wasting a lot of
>>> my time.
>>> What's especially interesting to me is a list that shows the trackers
>>> that have been blocked for each website I visit. For example, the
>>> intro page for cnn.com includes 10 such unwanted visitors with names
>>> like "Audience Science," "Dynamic Science," and "Scorecard Research."
>>> Fascinating stuff!
>> Just to say +1 for ghostery!
>> Since the prism revelations I am 'trying' to prevent the general
>> scooping of data, to at least make em work for it!
> I just installed it, and it seems to work, but who is it sending data back
> to? Just asking, but I always have the TANSTAAFL principle in mind. Just
> like if you think the peanuts are free, check the price of the beer. :)
> Cheers, Gene
Add to Ghostery the following extensions:
Secure Or Not
Using openSUSE 12.3, KDE 4.10.5 & kernel 3.10.0-1 on a system with-
AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor
16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair "Vengeance" RAM
Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
More information about the ubuntu-users