12.04.2 LTS, new install, network broken
woyciesjes at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jul 9 17:07:07 UTC 2013
On 07/09/2013 12:43 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Dave Woyciesjes
> <woyciesjes at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2013 12:14 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Avi Greenbury <lists at avi.co> wrote:
>>>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>>> The question is, can NM and resolvconf be excised without excising the
>>>>> of the system? TBD. In any event their initiation scripts can be nuked
>>>> You should be fine:
>>>> avi at fantastic:~$ apt-get --simulate remove network-manager
>>>> NOTE: This is only a simulation!
>>>> apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
>>>> Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
>>>> so don't depend on the relevance to the real current
>>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>>> Building dependency tree
>>>> Reading state information... Done
>>>> The following packages were automatically installed and are no
>>>> longer required:
>>>> libllvm3.1:i386 linux-headers-3.8.0-18
>>>> linux-headers-3.8.0-18-generic linux-image-3.8.0-18-generic
>>>> Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
>>>> The following packages will be REMOVED
>>>> network-manager network-manager-gnome resolvconf ubuntu-minimal
>>>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 4 to remove and 66 not upgraded.
>>>> Remv network-manager-gnome [0.9.8.0-1ubuntu2]
>>>> Remv network-manager [0.9.8.0-0ubuntu6]
>>>> Remv ubuntu-minimal [1.299]
>>>> Remv resolvconf [1.69ubuntu1]
>>>> avi at fantastic:~$
>>> Is advising people to remove ubuntu-minimal (especially as a list
>>> admin) appropriate? If you don't want to use resolvconf on a system,
>>> disable it. If the few KB/MB that it takes up disturb you, use equivs
>>> to create a dummy replacement resolvconf package.
>> Advising most people to remove it? No, not a good idea. But Gene H. is not
>> most people. Also, he asked a specific question, and got the answer.
> 1) I'm sure that Google differentiates between advice given to Gene
> and advice given to someone else...
Fair wise-crack on me.
> 2) Advising anyone to remove ubuntu-minimal is silly.
For most situations & people, sure.
> 3) I don't see how you (and one other person in this thread) think
> that Gene knows what he's doing when he could only fix a networking
> problem by copying some files over from another installation rather
> than finding the root cause and correcting the problem directly.
Not sure about the other person, but I can vouch for his skills by
knowing him for a bit from another list.
You do bring up a god point; While giving Gene the answer to his
questions, a disclaimer of sorts would be a good idea - explaining just
why removing it is not suggested.
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech - http://certification.comptia.org/
--- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst - http://www.ThinkHDI.com/
Registered Linux user number 464583
"Computers have lots of memory but no imagination."
"The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back."
- from some guy on the internet.
More information about the ubuntu-users