Partition Resizing Plan

Liam Proven lproven at gmail.com
Sun Dec 15 13:32:15 UTC 2013


On 13 December 2013 15:29, Barry Premeaux <bpremeaux at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is true.  Once a kernel update has proven stable, there isn't
> really any need to keep the old ones around.  I just need to learn to
> do a better job of cleaning up in this area.

[Nod]

Every time you upgrade, if your new kernel works, you're in business.
If it doesn't, go back to the previous one. On this basis, even when
being paranoid, I just keep the 1 previous version.

> I read through the same article, but didn't care for the possible oops
> factor.

Same here, at least until I significantly improve my regex skills. :-)

>   I am more comfortable with picking each kernel I want to
> remove, even if it is a little more time consuming.

I tend to nuke all the old ones at once if using Synaptic, one-by-one
if on the CLI.


-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list