ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 108, Issue 49

V Kanth vkanth16 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 18 15:49:24 UTC 2013


 hai
can i install any ubuntu versions  in my HTC Magic (my touch 3g) .If
possible which version  is best.And please send me the process to install
in my phone with out breaking the phone.Plz.

Thank you:

kanth


On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 5:30 PM, <ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com>wrote:

> Send ubuntu-users mailing list submissions to
>         ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         ubuntu-users-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Scanner (Canon n1240u) fails with "invalid parameter"
>       (Ric Moore)
>    2. Re: Blank Updates status (Ric Moore)
>    3. Re: Firefox issues (Basil Chupin)
>    4. Re: Firefox issues (Christofer C. Bell)
>    5. Re: Firefox issues (Ric Moore)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:09:21 -0400
> From: Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
>         <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Scanner (Canon n1240u) fails with "invalid parameter"
> Message-ID: <52101EC1.2010200 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 08/17/2013 12:02 PM, MR ZenWiz wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > :
> >>
> >> Once in awhile, with an HP combo I owned, that gave up the ghost as
> soon as
> >> the warranty ran out, I had to open and shut the scanner lid to reset
> >> something. Maybe the smoke had to be let out??
> >>
> >> I promised HP support that I would complain repeatedly in public forums
> >> about their lousy products and here's another Captain Ahab/Khan moment.
> >> <evil grin>  Ric
> >>
> > Unfortunately Canons don't seem to have the same resilience (?) as HP
> > - I tried pressing the scan button, opening and closing the lid,
> > unplugging and replugging the USB cord, even moving all my USB cables
> > around - no joy.
> >
> > Grr... (not to you, Ric, thanks!)
>
>
> Hrmmmmm, maybe someone will refresh my memory, but I dimly recall there
> was a group problem, where your user had to belong to a scanner group.
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ScanningHowTo
>
> Ahha! There you go! Ric
>
>
> --
> My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
> "There are two Great Sins in the world...
> ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
> Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
> /https://linuxcounter.net/cert/44256.png /
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:11:04 -0400
> From: Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
>         <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Blank Updates status
> Message-ID: <52101F28.2000906 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 08/17/2013 01:54 PM, John R. Sowden wrote:
> > I am surprised that we are not hearing feedback re: the blank updates.
> > Is canonical testing us to see if we are gullible enough to just
> > download anything?  Is this a survey to test our level of concern re:
> > security?
> >
> > This has been going on for a couple of weeks.  My concern is, am I not
> > downloading security improvements?  Are there others like me out there
> > (hello ...)?  This might mean that the ubuntu (x in my case) OS
> > computers all over the world are not current, which might be a security
> > or marketing risk (marketing-if we don't have the current revs, people
> > might complain about problems with the OS which are not problems at all,
> > just not current versions.)
> >
> > I might be over blowing this - I do that often.
>
> I agree. It's not something usual to have a blank update come down. I'd
> love to know the mechanism behind it, once the brain-caste figures it
> out. :) Ric
>
>
>
> --
> My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
> "There are two Great Sins in the world...
> ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
> Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
> /https://linuxcounter.net/cert/44256.png /
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:02:14 +1000
> From: Basil Chupin <blchupin at iinet.net.au>
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Firefox issues
> Message-ID: <52102B26.9090508 at iinet.net.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 18/08/13 09:02, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 08/17/2013 06:34 AM, pete smout wrote:
> > (I have recently added ghostery & foxyproxy so will disable
> >> them first and see what happens)
> >>
> >> Thanks for the prompt reply
> > I'd leave ghostery running. It makes firefox run MUCH quicker once
> > it's blocks the leech-like trackers. I wouldn't be without it. Ric
>
> However, keep in mind the the COMBINATION of NoScript and Ghostery may -
> will - stop needed info being sent to your screen. I found this out the
> hard way last night.
>
> I am waiting for the delivery of a new car I ordered and went here-
>
> http://www.toyota.com.au/aurion?WT.ac=Tab2Aurion
>
> to see the new "video" presentation of the car. However I couldn't see
> the display, but after fooling around with the Addons I found that by
> disabling NoScript and Ghostery together the "video" worked.
>
> So, if you come across a site like the one above and cannot see what you
> are supposed to see then consider disabling Ghostery (you don't have to
> reboot FF after doing this - just refresh the web page) and then
> NoScript (but with NoScript you have to actually restart FF).
>
> BC
>
> --
> Using openSUSE 12.3, KDE 4.11.0 & kernel 3.10.5-1 on a system with-
> AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor
> 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair "Vengeance" RAM
> Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 01:02:52 -0500
> From: "Christofer C. Bell" <christofer.c.bell at gmail.com>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
>         <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Firefox issues
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAOEVnYvsfyRW2q2qMo5hhWxmkpQ935D2jeiJ_oFuOCgAF35qQQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Basil Chupin <blchupin at iinet.net.au>
> wrote:
>
> > On 18/08/13 09:02, Ric Moore wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/17/2013 06:34 AM, pete smout wrote:
> >> (I have recently added ghostery & foxyproxy so will disable
> >>
> >>> them first and see what happens)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the prompt reply
> >>>
> >> I'd leave ghostery running. It makes firefox run MUCH quicker once it's
> >> blocks the leech-like trackers. I wouldn't be without it. Ric
> >>
> >
> > However, keep in mind the the COMBINATION of NoScript and Ghostery may -
> > will - stop needed info being sent to your screen. I found this out the
> > hard way last night.
> >
> > I am waiting for the delivery of a new car I ordered and went here-
> >
> > http://www.toyota.com.au/**aurion?WT.ac=Tab2Aurion<
> http://www.toyota.com.au/aurion?WT.ac=Tab2Aurion>
> >
> > to see the new "video" presentation of the car. However I couldn't see
> the
> > display, but after fooling around with the Addons I found that by
> disabling
> > NoScript and Ghostery together the "video" worked.
> >
> > So, if you come across a site like the one above and cannot see what you
> > are supposed to see then consider disabling Ghostery (you don't have to
> > reboot FF after doing this - just refresh the web page) and then NoScript
> > (but with NoScript you have to actually restart FF).
> >
> >
> I'm not certain NoScript actually needs to be disabled, does it?  You
> should be able to tell NoScript "Temporarily allow all scripts this page"
> or somesuch without having to fully disable the addon.
>
> --
> Chris
>
> "If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the
> Universe." -- Carl Sagan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20130818/479e41ad/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:26:25 -0400
> From: Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
>         <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Firefox issues
> Message-ID: <52109341.7090705 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 08/17/2013 10:02 PM, Basil Chupin wrote:
> > On 18/08/13 09:02, Ric Moore wrote:
> >> On 08/17/2013 06:34 AM, pete smout wrote:
> >> (I have recently added ghostery & foxyproxy so will disable
> >>> them first and see what happens)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the prompt reply
> >> I'd leave ghostery running. It makes firefox run MUCH quicker once
> >> it's blocks the leech-like trackers. I wouldn't be without it. Ric
> >
> > However, keep in mind the the COMBINATION of NoScript and Ghostery may -
> > will - stop needed info being sent to your screen. I found this out the
> > hard way last night.
> >
> > I am waiting for the delivery of a new car I ordered and went here-
> >
> > http://www.toyota.com.au/aurion?WT.ac=Tab2Aurion
> >
> > to see the new "video" presentation of the car. However I couldn't see
> > the display, but after fooling around with the Addons I found that by
> > disabling NoScript and Ghostery together the "video" worked.
> >
> > So, if you come across a site like the one above and cannot see what you
> > are supposed to see then consider disabling Ghostery (you don't have to
> > reboot FF after doing this - just refresh the web page) and then
> > NoScript (but with NoScript you have to actually restart FF).
>
> Huh, I don't use NoScript. And Ghostery, for me, displays the
> information where the video would be which tracker demands that you
> allow it to track you. I get my back up and refuse to see the video
> usually, unless I REALLY have to watch it. Ghostery will allow you to
> "always make an exception" or "one time only". It's slick! You can train
> it. Ric
>
>
>
> --
> My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
> "There are two Great Sins in the world...
> ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
> Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
> /https://linuxcounter.net/cert/44256.png /
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> End of ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 108, Issue 49
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20130818/051d198e/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list