Login failure after restart. Every time.
kogorman at gmail.com
Tue Mar 27 05:25:56 UTC 2012
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Basil Chupin <blchupin at iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On 24/03/12 03:00, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au>
>>> On 23/03/12 19:13, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au>
>>>>> I just checked 'man fsck' and there is no "-f" parameter/[switch] for
>>>>> There is "-r" but no "-f".
>>>> You have to read quite carefully to get it and be familiar with the
>>>> filesystem-specific options for your filesystem. Since the -f option
>>>> is not recognized by fsck proper, it is passed on the the actual
>>>> filesystem-specific executable. For most filesystems, it's a
>>>> force-flag that makes fsck.??? do a full check.
>>> I see.
>>> What you are trying to say is that it is an undocumented "feature".
>> I am not. Not at all.
>> From output of "man fsck":
>> Options which are not understood by fsck are
>> passed to the filesystem-specific checker.
>> These arguments must not take arguments, as there is no
>> way for fsck to be able to properly
>> guess which arguments take options and which don't.
>> Options and arguments which follow the -- are treated
>> as file system-specific options to be
>> passed to the file system-specific checker.
> Sorry for the delayed response but I have been trying to solve a couple of
> (nasty) hassles - one solved the other still in play :'( .
> OK, what all of the above states is that if fsck does not understand what it
> is you are trying to do then it sends the command to the
> "filesystem-specific checker" - which in case, assuming that you are using
> one of the extX filesystems, to e2fsck and with the parameter "-f"; and the
> "-f" parameter in e2fsck means to "force a check". If I remember correctly,
> the "f" parameter in Windows/OS2 chkdsk means "fix errors".
> Now, what I stated right from the start is that fsck is performed
> automatically on each boot of system and it found NOTHING wrong with the
> files system (ext4) on my wife's computer. Nothing - no errors, zilch, and
> yet her system was playing up something aweful. So, as I stated, I ran
> e2fsck manually and this found a host of errors; and because I did not use
> the "-p" parameter in e2fsck I was able to see what those errors were and
> answered YES everytime e2fsck asked if I wanted them to be corrected.
> If you are happy with the result of your exercise in running 'fsck -f' then
> I shall debate the issue with you no further. I can only relate to you my
> personal, real life, experience and how I solved my wife's computer hassles
> :-) .
Happy I'm not, but I'm satisfied the filesystem is clean. I still
have the original problem. I've filed a bug, but from the looks of it
it's just one of a great many bugs involving X crashes, freezes or
misbehavior, so I don't expect fast action. I would be *happy* to be
wrong about that last bit.
BTW, for e2fsck, the fix-everything switch is "-y" (mnemonic: "assume yes".)
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
More information about the ubuntu-users