OT re top-posting. was Re: Firefox and NoScript??
rtgkid at gmail.com
Fri Dec 14 21:12:31 UTC 2012
On 12/14/2012 02:55 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com
> <mailto:tomh0665 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman at gmail.com <mailto:kogorman at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com <mailto:tomh0665 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> [I'm replying without trimming because I'd like you to see your
> >> as I receive it and to see what you could (and should) trim.
> >> far too much unnecessary rubbish in your replies and those of
> > Gmail hides all of that from me. It's not hard to get it back,
> but it's not
> > automatic either. This may be the wave of the future, whether we
> like it or
> > not. With 10 GB and climbing of free space on gmail even permanently
> > archiving all of the lists I belong to, my percent usage keeps
> It's not storage space that I'm concerned about, it's relevance and
> clarity. Furthermore, the Ubuntu guidelines state that we should trim
> our replies.
> And there's the rub. You (over-)trimmed my message to remove the part
> where I said exactly the same thing (I'll do it as long as its in the
> guidelines). Makes me look more of a fool than I am. Maybe you
> didn't think it was relevant what I wrote. I do.
> This is an example of why I don't follow the obsessive approach to
> Kevin O'Gorman
> programmer, n. an organism that transmutes caffeine into software.
I agree with Kevin, and I don't really see the use of trimming messages...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-users