OT re top-posting. was Re: Firefox and NoScript??

[Bahn, Nathan]

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [I'm replying without trimming because I'd like you to see your email
>>> as I receive it and to see what you could (and should) trim. There's
>>> far too much unnecessary rubbish in your replies and those of Ryan!]
>>>
>> Gmail hides all of that from me. It's not hard to get it back, but it's not
>> automatic either. This may be the wave of the future, whether we like it or
>> not. With 10 GB and climbing of free space on gmail even permanently
>> archiving all of the lists I belong to, my percent usage keeps dropping.
>
> It's not storage space that I'm concerned about, it's relevance and
> clarity. Furthermore, the Ubuntu guidelines state that we should trim
> our replies.



T.H.--
Please show me what MY emails look like.  Thanks to you, I'm quite curious now!
-- 
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html ,
http://www.libreoffice.org/ &
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument (Nathan Bahn)