[ADMIN] Additional moderator(s) sought for ubuntu-users list

[NoOp]

On 09/27/2011 07:23 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> What I notice most about this thread is that it's a perfect example of what
> I don't want in a user support forum.
> The opposition -- ad nauseum -- to moderation, as well as some of the
> support, is a good meta-argument for
> moderation.
> 
> Sheesh!

And of course posting with:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee73cc11b3804adf712cf
So that we all get double the data...
:-(

> --===============0180685623106995789==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ee73cc11b3804adf712cf
> 
> --0016364ee73cc11b3804adf712cf
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> What I notice most about this thread is that it's a perfect example of what
> I don't want in a user support forum.
> The opposition -- ad nauseum -- to moderation, as well as some of the
> support, is a good meta-argument for
> moderation.
> 
> Sheesh!
> 
> -- 
> Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
> 
> --0016364ee73cc11b3804adf712cf
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> 
> What I notice most about this thread is that it's a perfect example of what I don't want in a user support forum.<br>The opposition -- ad nauseum -- to moderation, as well as some of the support, is a good meta-argument for<br>
> moderation.<br><br>Sheesh!<br><br>-- <br>Kevin O'Gorman, PhD<br><br>
> 
> --0016364ee73cc11b3804adf712cf--
> 
> 
> --===============0180685623106995789==
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
>