dosbox vs. wine
NoOp
glgxg at sbcglobal.net
Tue Mar 8 17:15:00 UTC 2011
On 03/07/2011 10:24 PM, Doug wrote:
> For general purpose use--not games--which program is better, in these
> respects: handles more DOS programs; more easily accessible to
> peripherals, like diskdrives, including floppies; less complicated to
> get working; less complicated to use. Would either one run Win 95 or
> Win 98,
> if required? (And if I could still find the disks!) Comments solicited
> on the questions I forgot to ask. (No, don't ask "why." The answer is
> technical programs that have no Linux counterpart.)
I've found dosemu to work quite well for my old Digger game. I've both
dosemu and dosbox installed & found dosemu simple & easy to use (for my
purpose).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOSEMU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOSBox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_platform_virtual_machines
Easiest way to find out is to just install them & try.
>
> The computer on which I would use it has an AMD Sempron running at 1500
> MHz, 2 GB ram, and an EVGA AGP video card with 528 MB ram.
>
> Thanx--doug
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list