Brief thoughts on Unity

Liam Proven lproven at gmail.com
Sun Jun 12 17:51:34 UTC 2011


On 12 June 2011 18:49, compdoc <compdoc at hotrodpc.com> wrote:
>>I waited until Windows 98 came out before
>>I tried 95, and I fought with Windows for control of my
>>machine for ages.
>
> Using old versions of any OS was never a good idea - not even with Windows.
> However, I see you're trying the latest version of Ubuntu, so you're headed
> in the right direction - congrats....
>
> I've read that Unity is designed to use less resources which is fine for
> netbooks and tablets and phones, but in its current state it's a step
> backward. Any decent laptop or desktop has these resources to burn, so give
> me a full-fledged gui over unity any day.
>
> The desktop is a metaphor that just works.

Erm... but Unity still /is/ a desktop. Icons, trashcan, etc. All it
really does is replace the GNOME 2 panels - everything else is more or
less exactly the same.

-- 
Liam Proven • Info & profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/lproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AIM/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list