why is kdm running at all?

[Bill Walton]

On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:45 PM, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I seem to recall that there was a thread sometime back that indicated
> that this process isn't the actual 'kdm' but is an x process of sorts.
> I'll see if I can find it.
>

Thanks.  While I'd love to just get rid of it, I'm a little more than
hesitant since it seems a bit unlikely to my uninformed mind that a
process that isn't needed is running this 'intensely.'

Best regards,
Bill