maverick: utmp/last is logging every xterm
C de-Avillez
hggdh2 at ubuntu.com
Thu Jan 27 23:21:06 UTC 2011
On 01/27/2011 04:16 PM, Adam Funk wrote:
>
> OK, that makes sense. Looking through the changelog [1], I get the
> impression that utmp logging was supposed to be included in lucid but
> couldn't be because libutempter was in universe; but in maverick that
> library is in main so the feature could be put in xterm. Of course, I
> could have the wrong end of the stick.
No, you are correct -- since libutempter was in Universe, xterm
could not depend on it to write utmp entries (unless xterm itself
was demoted from main) -- so it was built without the interface.
> I guess it's personal taste, but I'm not sure why anyone would want
> every xterm to be recorded as a log-in.
Consider the case where xterm is actually run "remotely" -- this, by
itself, could be a good reason to write an entry on utmp.
But, basically, we should not rely anymore on utmp giving us
up-to-date, correct, information.
Cheers,
..C..
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20110127/e89a6717/attachment.sig>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list