Let's talk about compression rates
S Mathias
smathias1972 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 22 10:44:39 UTC 2011
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MwDnhknf
$ ls -Sl
total 461252
-rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 111709730 Jan 22 11:06 linux-2.6.37.zip
-rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 93174605 Jan 22 11:03 linux-2.6.37.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 73552510 Jan 22 11:10 linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2
-rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 66333786 Jan 22 11:16 linux-2.6.37.7z
-rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 64035788 Jan 22 11:16 linux-2.6.37.tar.7z
-rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 63480808 Jan 22 11:20 linux-2.6.37.tar.xz
$
I presume kernel.org knows this. Why doesn't people use e.g.: XZ?
This is the same as in PDF's. DJVU files could be amazing too. They could compress [convert] a 400 MByte PDF to a 20 MByte DJVU. Amazing.
Why don't these technologies spread??
Any opinions regarding it?
Thanks.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list