Xournal: how to use for an existing pdf?
wayward4now at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 05:20:40 UTC 2011
On 12/06/2011 11:56 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:19:23 -0500
> Ric Moore<wayward4now at gmail.com> wrote:
>> the right to approve his edit and
>> receive a copy... just as the GPL states. Ric
> GPL v. 3? I don't recall those rights/restrictions. In fact, I'm
> almost positive that the GPL doesn't give an original author of
> software (or anything) approval of edit rights to refinements made by
> others, nor does it require a copy be sent to originators. All one is
> required to do is to include the license, credit those who have gone
> before (original and previous authors) and provide source code.
> ...as I understand it, but I am not a lawyer.
I'll be darned. I just read the V2 GPL online and it USED to have the
provision in it that if you modified another's code you owed the
revisions back to the original creator, who was then free in use the
improvement in his program. I recall. It ain't there now. I'm gonna dig
in some old CD's and see if I can find that version of the GPL. It
seemed like a common courtesy to me.
"And the times, they are a-changin' ". Ric
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
More information about the ubuntu-users