<OT> ubuntu bad press
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Fri Aug 26 05:15:04 UTC 2011
On 26/08/11 13:12, Rashkae wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 11:00 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>>> However, nothing says we can't have our cake and eat it too. Perhaps
>>> what you should be asking for, and expecting to get, is a backports
>>> for LTS that keeps popular applications up to date. That, I think,
>>> would be a very very good addition to Ubuntu LTS. Especially in these
>>> dark days ahead of desktop upheaval.
>> Exactly... I didn't use that term and I should have. I don't expect to
>> see Java 7 anytime soon, but the latest stable secure version of Java 6
>> should be a given, without exposing my root user via synaptic to a
>> private repo. anonymous just loves that.
> So after all that sniping, we agree to agree? That's rather
Yeah, it is rather..... But then his handbag is bigger, always contains
half a brick and he can swing it harder :-) .
But, wait! I see that NoOp has now decided to throw his hat into the
"Facts are stupid things."
More information about the ubuntu-users