No subject

[Tero Pesonen]

On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 00:37 +0300, Tero Pesonen wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 16:23 -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > Yes really, you defended a multi-part message which is worse then plain
> > HTML because it takes up more space than either one alone, it's both
> > combined so it's an absolute waste.  The entire justification of sending
> > plain text is bandwidth restrictions... 

You should then consider requesting people here to trim their replies
more carefully by removing unnecessary quoted text and the list
signature, as well as by ridding their messages of long personal
signatures which some people now see fit to apply to all outgoing list
mail. That would save quite a bit of bandwith and disk space at your
end.

Tero