forum archive not accessible anonymously
wayward4now at gmail.com
Sun Aug 7 19:02:57 UTC 2011
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 08:32 -0500, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 09:14:42 -0400
> Tom H <tomh0665 at gmail.com> didst polemicize thusly:
> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Alan Pope <alan at popey.com> wrote:
> > > On 7 August 2011 10:44, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What age are they being blocking at?
> > >
> > > I don't recall. Probably something like 2007 and older, but don't
> > > quote me on that.
> > The one that I posted was from 2007 so you're within that range.
> > It's a weird policy though!
> The page you referenced also says, "You are browsing a READ only
> archive of the main support categories pre 4/21/2008."
> I'd guess that indicates the age of 'blocked' articles.
Good idea too! There's nothing worse than old cruft being spewed forth,
like used corn from a goose, in a search. Kudos to whoever came up with
this policy. Namaskar, Ric
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256
More information about the ubuntu-users