Online backup recommendations for large Ubuntu dev server
J
dreadpiratejeff at gmail.com
Sun Apr 10 23:30:56 UTC 2011
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:12, Rashkae <ubuntu at tigershaunt.com> wrote:
> (including Ubutu One, I immagine).. My suggestion, however, is fire the
> CTO.. Why on earth would you want to outsource storage for that much data?
> The best you can hope to achieve is increase cost, increase potential
> exposure of sensitive data and decrease accountability (not a good thing
> other than some bizarre cover your ass by blaming someone else mentality.)
Because off-site backups are smart. There's always a risk of data,
but unless his company owns multiple data centers where they can send
backups to for redundancy, off-site backups make sense. I used to
work for an ISP and we stored about 2TB of data (2TB is not that much
data, really) of customer e-mail and websites. The company's backup
strategy was a tape robot in the DC, which was located in the
company's only office. And the off-site option? The CTO took tapes
home with her once a week... where they could be lost, damaged,
stolen, who knows what...
So what happens if the building burns? Floods? Airplane crashes into
it? No off-site backup of your data? Hope your servers are
water/fire/airplane proof.
In any case, there's no reason they couldn't just rent storage
somewhere and do encrypted backups to that storage space... hell, They
could even just rent a server with a ton of hard disks in it and do
nightly rsyncs, or use Amanda for free, or even Tar if they want to be
REALLY cheap about it.
I do somewhat agree with you on one point though, but for a different
reason. If they're only saving 2TB of data, they could buy a 2TB USB
hard drive for less than $150 US and just carry the backup home. of
course, that then creates the risk of leaving the backup drive in a
coffee shop or something...
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list