New KDE

[ms]

On 25/09/10 19:46, Ric Moore wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 09:25 -0500, Billie Walsh wrote:
>
>> I'm a happy KDE 4 user. I would no longer be afraid to recommend it to
>> someone else. I don't know that it is better or worse than KDE 3, just
>> different.
>
> I am as well, but I install Ubuntu (Gnome) first, then add KDE later. My
> pulseaudio works like a dream, one Gnome has it sorted out. Going the
> Kubuntu route appears to thoroughly blow it all up. They're admitting
> it, and will support pulse in the next cycle, but not for the LTS
> version. Go figure. Ric
>
>

I used KDE since the start of my Linux usage, (around 2004), and I used 
KDE 4 on Gentoo. KDE 4 is definitely a good desktop system now. The only 
thing that they botched beyond recognition is Amarok, that once was the 
best music player ever, and now... well, it's still good (and I still 
use it) but not nearly comparable to the interface and features of the 
old one.

However I now use Gnome: big step for me, since I've always found Gnome 
unbereable. But on Ubuntu 10.04, it feels just right. I still think 
Konqueror is much superior to Nautilus, but one can live with it.

m.