Upgrade from 8.04 to 10.04 LTS (BORKED)
Christopher Chan
christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk
Mon Sep 13 14:34:39 UTC 2010
Liam Proven wrote:
> On 13 September 2010 08:09, Christopher Chan
> <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk> wrote:
>>> When you look at the last URL, where is it mentioned that 10.04.1 is LTS
>>> - and what is 10.10 supposed to be?
>>>
>> 10.04 = Lucid, an LTS release that will get some attention with respects
>> to security holes for the next 1,1/2 or more years after its release.
>>
>> 10.10 = Merkat, a non LTS release that will get zero attention six
>> months after its release
>
> Normal releases do get support & upgrades for /eighteen/ months,
Oh, it was eighteen? I guess that is six months more than Fedora.
Upgrades? Did you say upgrades? Ha! Security and bug fixes yes but
upgrades? Nada, zip, zilch.
> rather than 6. For LTS releases, it's 3y on the desktop and 5y on the
> server, I believe, but I've never kept an LTS release around that
> long.
Of course not. You won't be able to live without the upgrades. I, on the
other hand, can. Actually, I had to fix kopete to get it to work with
Yahoo! messaging.
>
> But yes, after the next normal release is out, usually the main focus
> of the MOTU's attention shifts to it...
>
It's always the new toy, never about dealing with the insufficiencies of
stable releases. I guess Lucid is here so I'll clam up.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list