OT: 10.4 or 10.04

[Rashkae]

ms wrote:

> Well, no need of being to enforce an ISO format necessarily for such a 
> trivial matter :) , but yes, anything would be better than the dot 
> separator. 2010-04 seems to me the best thing (and could be written 
> 2010-4 without being misleading).

I think you're entirely too focused on the date... At the end of the the
day, it's a Version number, not a svn snapshot.  If it bothers you, just
forget that it has any connection to date whatsoever, and you'll have a
better understanding of it.