Unity Interface in 10.10 Netbook Edition
Thierry de Coulon
tcoulon at decoulon.ch
Fri Oct 29 16:39:40 UTC 2010
On Friday 29 October 2010 06:13:19 pm Liam Proven wrote:
> Not really funny. There's nothing wrong with Mac OS X. It's a very
> solid UNIX™ OS with a shell environment familiar if you know FreeBSD,
> and an excellent GUI with more polish than any other graphical OS on
> the planet. Sure, bits have DRM and things in but you can ignore them
> and use your own choice of tools - my OS X machines are full of FOSS
> apps.
I use Mac OS X, mainly for multimedia. It's the only GUI I have where often a
program that crashes will keep you from using anything else, and one of those
which give you the least feed back as to what is currently going on. And yes
you have a shell, but most of it is useless because Mac OS X is no more
organised as a *nix (directories and files with empty spaces in their name,
configuration that ignores the ususal *nix config files) .Try to go to
another partition at the command line and you'll understand what I mean.
When polish is used to hide defaults I'm not that impressed. Mac Os _has_ a
shell but it's not supposed to be used - the terminal is not to be found
in "Applications", but in it's subdirectory "Utilities"...)
So yes it's a nice OS, no I don't agree its the "most advanced" and while I
use it I clearly prefer Linux if I can get it done in Linux.
Thierry
--
"We live at a time when emotions and feelings count more than truth, an there
is a vast ignorance of science" James Lovelock
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list