Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program

[Goh Lip]

On Tuesday 02,November,2010 06:24 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> I had in my department on a wall in the corridor a table of 10.000
> random numbers ( actually pseudo-random as they were mathematically
> generated) and had indicated (circled) the 0,05 % significant numbers.
> You are surprised how many "significant" numbers are visible (500) and
> that is the level generally used in these "proofs". I don't know

Joep, as a neuroscientist, you should know not to argue with 
anosognosics with parietal lobe disfunction, but as a non-mathematician, 
please note a mathematically-generated random is totally random and not 
pseudo. That I am 110% sure.  :)

Regards - Goh Lip

ps: suggest a small read on statistical analysis of significant numbers

--