Wine?

[Luis Paulo]

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:31, Russ Foster <rjf at russfoster.com> wrote:
> The point of the original post was: don't run video editing software in a
> virtualized environment on a local machine.
>
> More specifically; there are two very resource intensive applications, video
> editing and sound editing.  These will not run better in a virtualized
> environment under any circumstances.
>

What is "run better"?

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 13:01, Jordon Bedwell <jordon at envygeeks.com> wrote:
> You guys wanna put money on whether they can't run very good on a
> virtual machine? This isn't aimed at Christopher, but I really do get
> tired of people blaming virtualisation for their /crappy/ and I repeat
> it again over and over /crappy/ hardware.

"run very good"? Are we kidding?

You are not meaning "run faster on a VM", right? Because if so, I may
give you some links about virtualization for you to read.

Virtualization is not about the run. The advantages may be found elsewhere.

One, is hardware abstraction. An example is to transport a server to a
different computer.

Other is running multi systems (or releases, or upgrade status) on the
same computer at the same time.
Running windows programs while running your favorite OS is an example.

The [virtualization] advantages may be found elsewhere.
May because you may not need virtualization. As in you may not need
internet, or a quad core, or another disk, or ...

Thats my opinion, and for now I'll stick to it.

Regards
Luis