Anyone else trying out the new btrfs file system?
Mike Fedyk
mfedyk at mikefedyk.com
Sun May 23 19:22:36 UTC 2010
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 10:47 AM, Charlie Brune wrote:
>> I've been looking at the new "btrfs" file system and it looks promising.
>>
>> Some of its design goals are:
>> -- Online defrag
>> -- Online resizing
>> -- Snapshots
>> ... and much more. Wiki is at
>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
>>
>> It looks like, ultimately, btrfs is the file system that we'll all be using.
>>
>> So ... I'm wondering if anyone else out there is trying it out. In
>> 10.04, you can download btrfs-tools and create btrfs file systems.
>>
>> I still haven't figured out how to resize a subvolume and some of the
>> other stuff.
>>
>> Keep in mind that it's still labeled as "experimental", so don't trust
>> your important data with it just yet. I have my btrfs file system
>> created on a 32G thumbdrive.
>
> http://www.netsplit.com/2010/05/14/btrfs-by-default-in-maverick/
> <quote>
> It’s a tough gauntlet, and it would only made with the knowledge that
> production servers and desktops can be run on Lucid as a fully supported
> version of Ubuntu at the same time. I’d give it a 1-in-5 chance.
> </quote>
>
> More:
> <http://www.webupd8.org/2010/05/20-chances-to-get-btrfs-in-ubuntu-1010.html>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs
Be advised. You'll want to use the latest upstream kernel, to my
knowledge Ubuntu is not backporting any of the latest fixes into the
2.6.32 kernel in 10.04.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list