Grub doesn't include other HD in list

[Gabriel S. Coonce]

Well, I think my drive may have just died. Checking around...

On May 21, 2010, at 8:35 PM, "Gabriel S. Coonce" <Gabriel.Coonce at fpsk12.org 
 > wrote:

> I got my iso the first day it was released...
>
> Did those updates, it did nothing.
>
> I'll try comman line booting it in a bit.
>
> On May 21, 2010, at 8:07 PM, "Tom H" <tomh0665 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Gabriel S. Coonce
>> <Gabriel.Coonce at fpsk12.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm on an Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit install. On one 500GB HD I have Vista
>>>> and 10.04. On a seperate 40GB HD I have Ubuntu 9.10 32-bit. Grub is
>>>> installed on the 500GB HD. But, on it's boot list, all I see are
>>>> 10.04 ( and it's kernels and recovery modes), memtest, and Vista. I
>>>> don't see any 9.10 installs. However, a "ls" command at grub  
>>>> command
>>>> prompt showed two hard drives. What's going on?
>>
>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/570765
>>
>> How recent is your install CD? As you can see in the lnk above, the
>> first isos of 10.04 had a problem detecting other OSs. Although this
>> might not be your exact problem given that grub can detect Vista,  
>> have
>> yourun "aptitude update && aptitude full-upgrade" and "update-grub"?
>>
>> Can you boot into your 9.10 install from the grub cli - since you see
>> the 9.10 disk?
>>
>> -- 
>> ubuntu-users mailing list
>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users