ubuntu-tweak
Basil Chupin
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Mon May 3 05:02:40 UTC 2010
On 03/05/10 13:50, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 20:42:11 -0400
> "Fred A. Miller"<fmiller at lightlink.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 05/02/2010 08:21 PM, Lucio M Nicolosi wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Fred A.
>>> Miller<fmiller at lightlink.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am interested to know why ubuntu-tweak isn't included IN the
>>>> "base" 32-bit and 64-bit releases. It's a very worthwhile
>>>> application for any user, but in particular for those new to
>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>> I guess the reason is that most tweaks are already available in a
>>> standard system, if you just care to look for them.
>>>
>>>
>> Many are hidden, and newbies AREN'T going to find them easily.
>> There's not a good reason not to include it that I can think of.
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
> Ubuntu wants to fit on a normal CD, not a DVD. Therefore it is
> necessary to miss out on some /good/ open programs in order to have Mono
> and related apps.
> Not to mention Ubuntu One which is alright (to fail to mention in this
> context) since Ubuntu needs to make some money somewhere with this OS.
>
> Cybe R. Wizard
>
You could get rid of that useless piece of junk called PulseAudio which
on its own takes up ~650Kb and put in the Tweak.
I consider Tweak UI to be an essential feature to be installed by default.
BC
--
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
Galileo Galilei
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list