New moderation technique, rewritten

[Res]

As much as it pains me to support Karl in any way, I must say, yet again 
it seems, the moderation on this list is a "boys club", Karl is all too 
often shutdown for speaking shit (often rightly so) and other of his 
OT related rants, however, the one sidedness blinds us all, as the 
infamous self appointed net-cops and the usual suspect cry baby who sulks 
to the apparent moderators of this list about him, me, and I think some 
others when things stray unrelated to the "user technical support", but 
yet feel they can do what they want (yes, hello van gassen) and OT rant 
anytime they want and get away with it, and do in fact get away with it 
now said cry baby concerned has not yet entered this threaed, but, there
are alot of people here who in my opinoin are here to troll and stir shit
etc, and currently mocking Karl apparently free to do so by the rose 
coloured glasses wearing moderators.

This is why I am most disliked here, because i believe rules apply to all 
and not just those not in your lil circle of mates, or those not in that 
circle.

So to the apparent moderators, pull your finger out and apply the rules 
evenly, If you cant do your job properly, piss off and let others who will
  do it, do it. Or, maybe I should staret complaining about you, I 
partitioned and made a lot of noise to get this list  official 
moderators to be rid of the self appointed net cops, but it seems the 
gooses put in that position are not able to impartionally carry out
said duties.


Res (who hasnt ever yet been "moderated", but likely will be now LOL)



On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Basil Chupin wrote:

> On 13/06/10 02:26, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Karl Larsen<klarsen1 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/12/2010 07:44 AM, Loïc Grenié wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2010/6/12 Karl Larsen<klarsen1 at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/12/2010 05:21 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/06/10 22:56, Karl Larsen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Yesterday I broke the moderation rule. It appears to be:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          moderation = number - x = 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> where number is the number of messages YOU sent.
>>>>>>> x is a moderation number selected by the moderator.
>>>>>>> When number and x are equal, your not able to send any message to this list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This list is unable to control the use of it. We get emails selling
>>>>>>> things. This "fix" will not fix this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          So I will again decide if I want to play games. 10.04 is running
>>>>>>> fine but there are still some things done better on 8.04. I was going to
>>>>>>> send in a bug report but that is so hard to do now I may not bother.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73 Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>      Here it is in simple terms.
>>>
>>> 1. At about 06-10-2010 at about 4:00 PM in the Mountain Zone which is
>>> 11:00 PM in England I tried to send a message to this list.
>>>
>>> 2. I am using Thunderbird version 3.0.4
>>>
>>> 3. When thunderbird tried to send the message it was slow.
>>>
>>> 4. After about 30 seconds it said it could not send message because it
>>> was denied.
>>>
>>> 5. I wrote a small test message and it was denied.
>>>
>>> 6. I wrote to another list and it worked fine.
>>>
>>> 7. The problem was in the Ubuntu list only.
>>>
>> Your formula doesn't make any sense though because you made very few
>> posts on the 10th and 11th.
>>
>
> Ssshhhh.....don't spoil it...I'm still waiting for 73 Karl to give me
> the name of that secret compound he ingests....
>
> BC
>
>
> -- 
> Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.
>                                            James Madison
>
>
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

--
Res

"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!