Critical Adobe Security Flaws

[Default User]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:33, Steve <yorvik.ubunto at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:45:22 +0100, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > On 06/07/2010 09:19 AM, Steve wrote:
> >> On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:00:23 +0100, NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 06/07/2010 06:32 AM, Steve wrote:
> >>>> Don’t know if you’ve seen this but might be worth checking which
> >>>> version
> >>>> you’re using
> >>>>
> >>>> www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa1-01.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I think you may have meant?
> >>>
> >>> http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa10-01.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yep, thanks.  Not sure why the zero went missing on a copy & paste.
> >>
> >
> > It's been updated for i386:
> > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin
> > but not for 64bit (yet):
> > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree
> > <
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/10.1.53.64-1lucid1>
> >
> >
> Received the 32 bit updates earlier.
> The 64 bit update may never happen
> labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/64bit.html
>
> --
> Steve (Yorvyk)
> http://lubuntu.net
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>



Oh, wonderful.  So, if you run 64-bit Lucid, you are left to die?

Or, can you remove 64-bit instances of flash and replace with 32-bit
versions (without major surgery)?

And would that be a good idea, even if it works?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20100611/9838377e/attachment.html>