sshfs vs nfs

Chris Jones christopher.rob.jones at cern.ch
Tue Jul 13 21:35:27 UTC 2010


On 13 Jul 2010, at 6:59pm, Jordon Bedwell wrote:

> On 7/13/2010 6:06 AM, Michael Comperchio wrote:
>> I have two machines, Lancelot, a tower that I sit at and work, and
>> Gawain, a laptop that comes with me when I leave the 'office'. Both
>> running 10.4 quite well. I simply want the Lancelot to be able to see my
>> home directory on Gawain, and the other way around, when I am home.
>> 
>> At this point I simply 'sshfs' mount the directories... is this an 'ok'
>> way to do this, or should I putz around with nfs?
> 
> Personally, I would use SSH  to tunnel NFS securely anyways because I'm
> not a fan of SNFS So to be honest, if SSHFS does the job for you then
> use it till the day it stops working right and you need to find a more
> fitting solution.


Agreed. NFS is completely insecure so OK (perhaps) in some closed network environments, but anything that goes via the general internet, sshfs is by far better.



More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list