8.04 -> 10.04 /dev/md0 not created in intiramfs
rob at steinmetznet.com
Thu Jul 8 06:33:49 UTC 2010
I'm aware of that. Does this configuration mean that mdadm is running
before lvm and if so how do I correct it?
On 7/8/2010 12:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> In /lib/udev/rules I found;
>> If I were guessing (and I am) I would expect 85_lvm2 to be run before
>> 85_mdadm, which is the wrong order. I also found 56_lvm.rules which
>> doesn't seem to do anything.
> mdadm should run before lvm. lvm can run on md devices and so lvm can
> have a dependency on mdadm
*Robert Steinmetz, AIA*
*Steinmetz & Associates*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-users