On 01/31/2010 01:45 PM, Amedee Van Gasse wrote: > On 31-01-10 22:32, Patton Echols wrote: > > >> Also, without ad hominem attacks. >> > > Good point. You could even go further: > "That is wrong because $a, $b, $c . . ." vs > "I think that is wrong because $a, $b, $c . . ." > > That's even less ad hominem. > > Is "RTFM" an ad hominem attack? ;-)