32 or 64??

Robert Holtzman holtzm at cox.net
Sun Jan 31 19:40:35 UTC 2010


On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 01:42:47AM -0500, anubis wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 23:33 -0700, RobertHoltzman wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> If you have a 64bit machine with more than 3+ GB of ram install and use
> > > >> the 64bit OS. Don't listen to any of this fear, uncertainty and
> > > >> disinformation in this thread. One would think this issue has been long
> > > >> dead and solved, but here we are again.
> > > > 
> > > > Excuse me but could you point out what about the quoted message is FUD?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > The part about being "safe" by avoiding 64bit. Sounds like evoking fear.
> > > You sound certain, but uninformed, as nothing is unsafe about running
> > > 64bit. So,that covers the fear,uncertainty, and disinformation.
> > > 
> > 
> > It may sound that way to you but not to others.
> > 
> > > Basically, you have no idea what you are talking about.
> > 
> > Let's see....I asked a question and suddenly I don't know what I'm
> > talking about. You sure you're not related to Karl?
> > 
> 
> Are you sure you are not Karl? You are the one giving the bogus advise
> to stay away from a topic of which you've already displayed gross
> ignorance.

I didn't give any advice. I asked a question. If you really meant to
reply to my post, go back and read it again....with comprehension! 


-- 
Bob Holtzman
Key ID: 8D549279
"If you think you're getting free lunch,
 check the price of the beer"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20100131/31c51a11/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list