32 or 64??
anubis
darthanubis at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 06:57:02 UTC 2010
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:52 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'm going to regret this, but...
>
> Res wrote:
> > wow, all them interwebs servers running 64 bit for many many many years,
> > all "unsafe" hahaha
>
> There is a difference between using 64 on a server and 64 on a desktop.
> For example, the lack of a 64-bit flash player:
> http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/000/6b3af6c9.html
>
> People running servers generally aren't going to be viewing Flash content
> so that's not an issue. Desktop users, especially those who come to this list
> for advice, generally do view flash content so handling how to get that
> working is a consideration and thus a valid reason to err on the side of caution.
>
> --
> Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
> PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
> -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
>
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html
https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash
There are NO more excuses for this fear of 64bit. Only the truly
willfully ignorant will avoid 64bit. Because if you can operate a
browser and a search engine you know this is a dead horse we are
clubbing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20100131/dbca8462/attachment.sig>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list