Gimp fonts question

NoOp glgxg at
Sun Jan 31 02:00:19 UTC 2010

On 01/28/2010 04:00 AM, R Kimber wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:38:23 -0800
> NoOp wrote:
>> Sigh... I give up. I've no idea what "the expected effect" may be. Good
>> luck.
> That's bizarre, since I explained what I took to be the expected effect in
> a previous post:-
>> Well, all the fonts I've added there will not be available, surely.
> - Richard.

No. You simply stated "It just has the expected effect.". You didn't
mention if the font bothering you (kochi etc) were removed, or what the
exact changes/observations were after you removed the ~/.fonts
reference. So, I can only assume that: 1) you added the fonts you
complain about to ~/.fonts, 2) haven't bothered to search for the fonts
that somehow annoy you, 3) and if you have
/usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/ in gimp preferences you've
added it yourself (as well as ~/.fonts. Neither folder gets added by
default in gimp.


$ locate kochi

doesn't find that font in /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/public/

More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list