9.10 with TeX Live 2009 and TeXmaker 1.9.2

[Christoph Bier]

Christian Pleul schrieb am 07.01.2010 20:24:

> Am 07.01.2010 um 12:30 schrieb Christoph Bier:
> 
>> Christian Pleul schrieb am 06.01.2010 22:39:
>> 
>>> Am 03.01.2010 um 15:38 schrieb Christoph Bier:
>>> 
>>>> Christian Pleul schrieb am 03.01.2010 09:14:

[...]

> chrisp at chrisp-desktop:~$ dpkg -l tex-common 
> Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Vollständig
> Löschen/Halten |
> Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/Fehlgeschl.
> Konfiguration/ Halb installiert/Trigger erWartet/Trigger anhängig
>  |/ Fehler?=(kein)/R=Neuinstallation notwendig (Status, Fehler:
> GROSS=schlecht) ||/ Name           Version        Beschreibung 
> +++-==============-==============-============================================
>  ii  tex-common     1.20           common infrastructure for
> building and i

So, there is another TeXLive installation (Ubuntu's TeXLive).
Actually you can remove those packages if you configure Synaptic not
to install recommended packages---assumed they were installed "by
accident" when installing TeXmaker.

[...]

> Using this "Optionen → Texmaker konfigurieren", I am able to
> navigate to the valid directory. E.g. I can use
> 
> "/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/i386-linux/latex"
> -interaction=nonstopmode %.tex
> 
> instead of the standard notation
> 
> latex -interaction=nonstopmode %.tex

That was just to make sure that it doesn't point to
/path/to/ubuntu's/texlive/packages. The standard notation should
work because "which pdflatex" and "which latex" point to the right
executable.

> But I still ponder on the reason why it is not working with
> standard notation.

Me, too. Though the output of pdflatex you sent in your first
posting wasn't as expected I'd like to see what

	latex -v

prints.

Best
Christoph
-- 
+++ Typografie-Regeln (1.7): http://zvisionwelt.de/?page_id=56