Hopeless cause

[Res]

No, Chris is not moderated

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Kenneth Loafman wrote:

> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> methinks he really is being moderated. Otherwise he is really
>> disciplined to give the appearance of being moderated. I doubt he is
>> capable of that. Not when he is reaching child mentality. Let's examine
>> the headers of one of his emails....
>>
>> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
>> 	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
>> 	(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com>)
>> 	id 1NhfhA-0002ro-Fi; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:55:44 +0000
>> Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196])
>> 	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
>> 	(envelope-from <klarsen1 at gmail.com>) id 1NhYgQ-0001XZ-3R
>> 	for ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:26:30 +0000
>>
>> Yup, smacks of moderation. He's earned it.
>
> Nope, unless we're all being moderated... that's the same I get from the
> list, even your messages, and I doubt we're being moderated.
>
> ...Ken
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

--
Res

"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!