Hopeless cause

[Chan Chung Hang Christopher]

Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> methinks he really is being moderated. Otherwise he is really 
>> disciplined to give the appearance of being moderated. I doubt he is 
>> capable of that. Not when he is reaching child mentality. Let's examine 
>> the headers of one of his emails....
>>
>> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
>> 	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
>> 	(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com>)
>> 	id 1NhfhA-0002ro-Fi; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:55:44 +0000
>> Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196])
>> 	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
>> 	(envelope-from <klarsen1 at gmail.com>) id 1NhYgQ-0001XZ-3R
>> 	for ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:26:30 +0000
>>
>> Yup, smacks of moderation. He's earned it.
> 
> Nope, unless we're all being moderated... that's the same I get from the
> list, even your messages, and I doubt we're being moderated.
> 

Nope, look again at your headers:

Received: from chlorine.canonical.com (chlorine.canonical.com 
[91.189.94.204])
	by mail.bradbury.edu.hk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F80551FC
	for <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:13:55 +0800 
(HKT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com>)
	id 1NhkcG-0008Dr-DJ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:11:00 +0000
Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49])
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kenneth at loafman.com>) id 1Nhkc8-0008C5-Uh
	for ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:10:53 +0000

You do not have a six hour latency like Karl.