Hopeless cause

[Chan Chung Hang Christopher]

Amedee Van Gasse (ub) wrote:
> On Mon, February 15, 2010 19:09, Chris Jones wrote:
>>> 	IIRC, a few days ago Karl did mention that he was now being moderated.
>>> I would think thatif/when someone does get put on the moderation list by
>>> the list management, the person would be notified of th edecision; so he
>>> would then know he was being moderated....
>> I remember that, but it wasn't clear to me from what I read (and I confess
>> I don't exactly follow karl that closely...) if Karl had really been told
>> he was to be moderated, or if he just assumed he was.
>>
>> If he really is being moderated, then he only has himself to blame....
> 
> Karl *is* moderated, but only on an individual basis. Some people have a
> line for him in their .procmailrc, some don't.
> But I don't think that there is a central moderation by a list manager. Yet.
> 
> 

methinks he really is being moderated. Otherwise he is really 
disciplined to give the appearance of being moderated. I doubt he is 
capable of that. Not when he is reaching child mentality. Let's examine 
the headers of one of his emails....

Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com>)
	id 1NhfhA-0002ro-Fi; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:55:44 +0000
Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196])
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <klarsen1 at gmail.com>) id 1NhYgQ-0001XZ-3R
	for ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:26:30 +0000

Yup, smacks of moderation. He's earned it.