basic - continued
iodine at runbox.no
Mon Feb 8 14:29:20 UTC 2010
Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:35:17 +0100
> Gilles Gravier <ggravier at fsfe.org> wrote:
>> On 08/02/2010 09:28, TSmith wrote:
>>> > In any case, unless you're actually building a file server or a
>>> > mail server, having an anti-virus on Linux is pretty much
>>> > overkill.
>>> Why overkill?
>> Well... given the actual number of Linux viruses in the wild... And
>> the system security mecanisms (which prevent a user application from
>> messing with system files)...
>> Most Linux antivirus use virus definition files for Windows... because
>> they are used to control files stored on a file server (serving
>> Windows machines) or a mail server (accessed by Windows clients).
> I'd like to further state that anti-virus software still can only
> protect from the known. It can't protect from what is coming up
> tomorrow or the next day. It is a rear-guard action at the very best.
You've never heard of heuristic analysis, huh?
More information about the ubuntu-users