64 bit info
anothermindbomb at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 21:05:11 UTC 2010
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Karl F. Larsen <klarsen1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> top - 08:14:07 up 12:28, 3 users, load average: 0.43, 0.18, 0.11
> Tasks: 145 total, 1 running, 144 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0
> Cpu(s): 6.0%us, 3.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 90.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 1796700k total, 1451832k used, 344868k free,
> 139252k buffers
> Swap: 1959920k total, 0k used, 1959920k free,
> 757764k cached
> Notice I have 2 GB of RAM and the 64bit 9.10 is using just
> 1.45 GB of the RAM. I wasted $92 on new fast RAM which I was
> assured you need.
I don't see anywhere that anyone said that you need > 4Gb ram to run 64 bit.
> From these measurements it is clear that 64 bit runs fine
> with just 2 GB of RAM. The people claiming you need 4GB are wrong.
Yup - just like I told you, you didn't need to drop 90 bucks on more
memory to move to a 64 bit kernel.
Honestly Karl, it's shit like this that make most people on here laugh at you.
When one person suffers from a delusion it is insanity. When many
people suffer from a delusion it is called religion.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
More information about the ubuntu-users