OT: was: Re: 32 or 64??
iodine at runbox.no
Tue Feb 2 19:29:54 UTC 2010
Gilles Gravier wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 19:33, Smoot Carl-Mitchell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:55 -0500, Rashkae wrote:
>>> I couldn't help but notice recently, much to my cost, that Intel is
>>> removing Virtualization extensions on all their current socket 775
>>> CPU's.. (how are the i5 and i7 faring?). The only reason I can think
>>> for this move is to prevent the low end cpus from competing with the
>>> workstation/server market, since these cpu's are now more than fast
>>> enough for many workloads to be simply io bound.
>> I would not surprise me that Intel would do this sort of thing. They are
>> very clever at maintaining their profit margin.
> FUD. All Intel processors (well... Celerons don't really qualify, here)
> support VT-X.
Not true. Here are some non-Celerons
that do not support VT-x:
Core Duo: T2050 / T2250 / T2300E / T2450
Core Duo 2: E4300 / E4400 / E4500 / E4600 / E4700
Core 2 Quad: Q8200 / Q8200S
As I've said repeatedly, you can all get your facts straight
by going to this page:
More information about the ubuntu-users